Post-Prandial Philosophy, page 1 by Grant Allen
<< Return to Title Details & Download2
THE RULES 53
VIII. THE RÔLE OF PROPHET 61
IX. THE ROMANCE OF THE CLASH OF RACES 70
X. THE MONOPOLIST INSTINCTS 79
XI. "MERE AMATEURS" 87
XII. A SQUALID VILLAGE 95
XIII. CONCERNING ZEITGEIST 104
XIV. THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE 112
XV. EYE versus EAR 122
XVI. THE POLITICAL PUPA 130
XVII. ON THE CASINO TERRACE 138
XVIII. THE CELTIC FRINGE 147
XIX. IMAGINATION AND RADICALS 156
XX. ABOUT ABROAD 165
XXI. WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL 173
XXII. ANENT ART PRODUCTION 182
XXIII. A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA 190
XXIV. OF SECOND CHAMBERS 199
XXV. A POINT OF CRITICISM 207
POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY
I.
THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES.
A distinguished Positivist friend of mine, who is in most matters a practical man of the world, astonished me greatly the other day at Venice, by the grave remark that Italian was destined to be the language of the future. I found on inquiry he had inherited the notion direct from Auguste Comte, who justified it on the purely sentimental and unpractical ground that the tongue of Dante had never yet been associated with any great national defeat or disgrace. The idea surprised me not a little; because it displays such a profound misconception of what language is, and why people use it. The speech of the world will not be decided on mere grounds of sentiment: the tongue that survives will not survive because it is so admirably adapted for the manufacture of rhymes or epigrams. Stern need compels. Frenchmen and Germans, in congress assembled, and looking about them for a means of intercommunication, might indeed agree to accept Italian then and there as an international compromise. But congresses don't make or unmake the habits of everyday life; and the growth or spread of a language is a thing as much beyond our deliberate human control as the rise or fall of the barometer.
My friend's remark, however, set me thinking