In Defense of Women
In Defense of Women
The original goal of this work was to clarify Mencken's views on women as inconsistently presented in newspaper columns, reviews, and plays.According to Mencken's biographer ''...he was either a great defender of women's rights or, as a critic labelled him in 1916, 'the greatest misogynist since Schopenhauer','the country's high-priest of woman-haters.'''
Book Excerpt
even the trade in public offices and contracts, occupies the
rulers of the land so steadily, or makes heavier demands upon their
ingenuity and their patriotic passion.
Familiar with the risks flowing out of it--and having just had to change the plates of my "Book of Prefaces," a book of purely literary criticism, wholly without political purpose or significance, in order to get it through the mails, I determined to make this brochure upon the woman question extremely pianissimo in tone, and to avoid burdening it with any ideas of an unfamiliar, and hence illegal nature. So deciding, I presently added a bravura touch: the unquenchable vanity of the intellectual snob asserting itself over all prudence. That is to say, I laid down the rule that no idea should go into the book that was not already so obvious that it had been embodied in the proverbial philosophy, or folk-wisdom, of some civilized nation, including the Chinese. To this rule I remained faithful throughout. In its original form, as publish
FREE EBOOKS AND DEALS
(view all)Popular books in Satire, Criticism, Essays, Women's Studies, Non-fiction
Readers reviews
4.0
LoginSign up
Mencken is not so much a misogynist as he is a misanthrope. He hates humanity: Men for their stupidity and sentimentality, and women for their superior intellect, more sensitive aesthetic sense, and for their ruthlessness.
He has a wonderful vocabulary, which makes the typos in the book more distracting than usual. It could have been shorter--he made his case early--but it was an enjoyable read.
He has a wonderful vocabulary, which makes the typos in the book more distracting than usual. It could have been shorter--he made his case early--but it was an enjoyable read.
- Upvote (1)
- Downvote (0)
This is very funny. It's impossible to decide if Mencken is a feminist or a misogynist. Probably both. This book is still largely relevant.
11/19/2009
Any young man contemplating marriage should read this with great attention!
Mencken did not hate women....but he knew them well...
Mencken did not hate women....but he knew them well...
11/29/2008
Popular questions
(view all)Books added this week
(view all)
No books found