Some Mooted Questions in Reinforced Concrete Design

American Society of Civil Engineers, Transactions, Paper - No. 1169, Volume LXX, Dec. 1910

Author: Edward Godfrey
Published: 1910
Language: English
Wordcount: 52,536 / 161 pg
Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease: 65.5
LoC Category: TA
Downloads: 382
Added to site: 2005.11.23
mnybks.net#: 11499
Origin: gutenberg.org
Genre: Non-fiction
Advertisement
Excerpt

his is exactly analogous to shear rods which cannot act until failure has begun.

When the man who tears down by criticism fails to point out the way to build up, he is a destructive critic. If, under the circumstances, designing with shear rods had the virtue of being the best thing to do with the steel and concrete disposed in a beam, as far as experience and logic in their present state could decide, nothing would be gained by simply criticising this method of design. But logic and tests have shown a far simpler, more effective, and more economical means of disposing of the steel in a reinforced concrete beam.

In shallow beams there is little need of provision for taking shear by any other means than the concrete itself. The writer has seen a reinforced slab support a very heavy load by simple friction, for the slab was cracked close to the supports. In slabs, shear is seldom provided for in the steel reinforcement. It is only when beams begin to have a depth approximating one-tenth of the span that t

Cover image for

Download


show mobile phone QR code

Donate a small amount via Paypal below or read about some other ways that you can support ManyBooks.